ArticleHealth economics review2026
Paying for hospital care in seven central and Eastern European countries - a comparative analysis.
Article in Health economics review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Financing Regimes and Case-Mix Complexity in Psychiatric Hospitals Beyond the Pandemic Shock-Insights from a Regional European Healthcare System.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe systems for paying health care providers consist of a complex set of arrangements, including payment methods and supporting elements. A diversity of payment methods exists, and for each of them the administrative process of setting prices (tariffs) plays a pivotal role. It defines the exact amount of money that a purchaser pays a health care provider for delivering a given service, unit of activity, or specific outcome. This study aimed to provide a structured comparison of the systems for setting prices for hospital care services in the public health insurance systems of seven Central and Eastern European countries (Bulgaria, Estonia, Czechia, Hungary, Lithuania, Poland, and Slovakia), as well as identify major challenges.
methodsThe methods involved three consecutive steps: (1) a conceptual framework and data collection form were developed based on existing literature; (2) national experts identified through purposive, snow-ball sampling were asked to complete the data collection form; and (3) a comparative analysis was performed.
resultsAll analysed CEE countries use mixed payment methods, with a dominant role of diagnose-related groups, in paying for hospital care provision. The price-setting process follows similar general steps: collecting costing data; calculating tariff weights; setting the price by using a dedicated base rate; conducting negotiations with providers; and applying price adjustments. However, the scope and details of each element may vary significantly between the countries. In Hungary and Bulgaria, there is no structured costs data collection process (historical weights are adjusted). The analysed countries face similar challenges in building effective price-setting systems: (1) incomplete and/or low quality hospital cost data, (2) insufficient institutional capacity; (3) methodological challenges of the costing model; and (4) barriers driven by the overall health system context. These challenges can lead to both under- and over-pricing of hospital services and generate system-level inefficiencies.
conclusionsThere is a strong need to support investments in data infrastructure and improvements in system governance across all analysed countries. Digital solutions could enhance the efficiency of the process by limiting the potential trade-off between the timeliness (and accuracy) of reporting cost data and the feasibility constraints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.