Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41588269›Full record

ArticleScience China. Life sciences2026

Floral fragrance in sweet osmanthus majorly repels pollen feeders.

Hui-Hui Feng, Cheng-Xi Tan, Shao-Cheng Huang, Shuang-Quan Huang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Science China. Life sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hui-Hui FengInstitute of Evolution and Ecology, School of Life Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, 430079, China.
Cheng-Xi TanInstitute of Evolution and Ecology, School of Life Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, 430079, China.
Shao-Cheng HuangInstitute of Evolution and Ecology, School of Life Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, 430079, China.
Shuang-Quan HuangInstitute of Evolution and Ecology, School of Life Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, 430079, China. hsq@ccnu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Why some flowers are so fragrant remains mysterious. The hypothesis of pollinator-mediated selection suggests that floral scent offers olfactory signals attracting pollen vectors, but it may be susceptible to pollen consumers. To explore the filtering hypothesis of floral scent that lures potential pollinators but repels pollinivores, here we provide the first report that thrips were the only effective pollinators for Osmanthus fragrans (Oleaceae), a famous fragrant tree whose flowers produce no nectar, although co-flowering species were pollinated by diverse insects, including honeybees, in both wild and cultivated populations. A series of experimental tests of ecological functions in floral scent demonstrate that two major aromatic compounds, β-ionone and linalool, both deter honeybee visits, but β-ionone attracts thrips. Honeybees obviously avoided O. fragrans, and ceased re-visiting Hibiscus mutabilis flowers that were artificially added linalool or β-ionone, illustrating a push-pull strategy using floral scent to recruit thrips pollinators but repel pollen feeders to reduce pollen consumption. The finding of β-ionone as an olfactory signal filtering pollen vectors highlights that the diversity of floral volatiles could also be selected by antagonists via pollen protection from pollinivore repellence.

Indexed as

FlowersOdorantsOleaceaePollenPollinationAcyclic MonoterpenesAnimalsBeesMonoterpenesNorisoprenoidsThysanopteraAcyclic Monoterpenesbeta-iononelinaloolMonoterpenesNorisoprenoidschemical defense of floral scentinsect preference testlinaloolOsmanthus fragranspollen feederthrips pollinationβ-ionone

Identifiers

PMID41588269

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.