ArticleBMC public health2026
Interaction between air pollution and diet on cognitive function in schoolchildren.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesThis study aimed to investigate the joint effects of air pollution exposure and dietary total antioxidant capacity (dTAC) on short-term memory and concentration among elementary school students in two regions of Tehran. MATERIALS AND
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted on 300 female primary school students, aged 9–12 years, with 150 students selected from a more polluted district and 150 from a less polluted area. Dietary intake was assessed using a validated Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) from the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study (TLGS). Concentration was measured using the Continuous Performance Test (CPT), and memory was assessed with the Wechsler Memory Scale. Statistical analyses included Chi-square tests and two-way ANOVA to evaluate main effects and interactions.
resultsDemographic information such as students’ age, anthropometrics, outdoor activity, and parents’ socioeconomic characteristics was obtained via parental questionnaires. Students were categorized into low (TAC1) and high (TAC2) dietary antioxidant groups. Students in the TAC1 group spent less time outdoors and were slightly shorter and heavier, although the latter difference was not statistically significant. In this cross-sectional analysis, both dietary total antioxidant capacity (dTAC) and air pollution levels were significantly associated with concentration performance (P < 0.05). Higher dTAC and lower pollution exposure were linked to improved concentration scores. However, the interaction between dietary antioxidant capacity and air pollution on memory performance was not statistically significant, indicating no measurable buffering effect in this domain.
conclusionConsidering the observational design of the study, children with higher intake of antioxidant-rich foods—such as fruits and micronutrients including vitamins A, C, and B9—tended to show greater total antioxidant capacity (TAC). This higher TAC was modestly associated with improved concentration performance, particularly in models adjusting for dietary and sociodemographic factors. Although associations with memory outcomes were not statistically significant, consistent patterns across multiple adjusted models suggest a potential link worth further investigation. These findings highlight the relevance of dietary antioxidant intake in relation to cognitive functioning, particularly under varying air pollution exposures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.