Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41588476›Full record

Trial reportJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2026

Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy for Mild-to-Moderate Knee Osteoarthritis: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.

Kenney Ki Lee Lau, Abbey Ssu Chi Chen, Christine Hoi Yan Fu, Jonathan Patrick Ng, Michael Tim Yun Ong, Patrick Shu Hang Yung, Pauline Po Yee Lui

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05442697 (Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05442697 nacompletednot on this map

Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields (PEMF) in Knee Osteoarthritis: a Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomised Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorChinese University of Hong KongRan2022 to 2024Enrolled60ConditionsKnee OsteoarthritisArmsPEMF treatment, Placebo treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kenney Ki Lee LauDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9958-3044
Abbey Ssu Chi ChenDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5275-8409
Christine Hoi Yan FuDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2601-7543
Jonathan Patrick NgDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0167-8000
Michael Tim Yun OngDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4460-9286
Patrick Shu Hang YungDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7214-5503
Pauline Po Yee LuiDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2446-6203

Funding

InnoHK initiative of the Innovation and Technology Commission of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government ITC RC/IHK/4/7
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent treatments for knee osteoarthritis (OA) offer limited functional and structural improvements. Compared to age- and gender-matched controls, patients with knee OA show a higher prevalence of muscle weakness, which negatively affects their ability to exercise-a key factor in enhancing physical mobility and delaying disease progression. Pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy shows promise in promoting myogenesis and chondrogenesis in pre-clinical studies. However, its effects on muscle strength and size, cartilage deterioration and overall physical function in knee OA patients remain unclear. This randomized placebo-controlled trial aimed to evaluate the impact of PEMF therapy on knee muscle power, lean muscle mass, femoral cartilage thickness, minimum joint space width (mJSW), lower limb physical functions and knee-specific patient-reported outcome (PRO) in patients with refractory mild-to-moderate knee OA.

methodsSixty refractory knee OA patients, aged 50 and older, with a pain score of 4 or higher were randomized to receive either PEMF or SHAM treatment for 30 min, 3 times a week over 8 weeks. Outcome measures, including muscle strength, lean muscle mass, cartilage thickness, mJSW, mobility and PRO were assessed at baseline, immediate post-intervention and 6- and 12-month post-intervention.

resultsSignificant interactions were observed between PEMF therapy and time for both knee extension peak torque (p < 0.001) and knee flexion peak torque (p = 0.007). Post hoc analysis revealed that PEMF significantly increased extension peak torque compared to the SHAM group at 6-month post-intervention (p = 0.042). The PEMF group showed a 72% increase in knee extensor strength after 6 months from baseline, whereas the SHAM group only saw a 25% increase (p = 0.003). However, no significant difference in knee flexion peak torque was detected between the PEMF and SHAM treatments in the post hoc analysis. Nonetheless, the knee flexor strength in the PEMF group increased by 72% at 6 months from baseline, whereas the SHAM group showed only a 24% rise (p = 0.022). Additionally, there were no differences between the PEMF and SHAM groups in lean muscle mass, cartilage thickness, mJSW, the 6-m walk time and the number of repetitions of chair standing in 30 s and WOMAC (all p > 0.05).

conclusionsAn 8-week course of PEMF therapy significantly improved the knee extension strength in refractory patients with mild to moderate knee OA at 6-month post-intervention, suggesting its potential to address extensor weakness in this high-risk population. However, it did not significantly enhance knee flexion strength, lean muscle mass, cartilage thickness, mJSW, lower limb physical functions or PRO up to 12-month post-intervention. Further research is needed to identify treatment regimens that may promote structural and functional outcomes in knee OA patients.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05442697.

Indexed as

Magnetic Field TherapyOsteoarthritis, KneeAgedDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscle StrengthTreatment Outcomedegenerative knee arthritiselectromagnetic fieldsknee arthrosesknee osteoarthritisknee osteoarthrosispulsed electromagnetic field therapy

Identifiers

PMID41588476
PMCPMC12834700

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.