Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41589110›Full record

Trial reportPeerJ2026

Walking towards psychosocial well-being? Unveiling psychosocial impacts of a group-based walking program with and without cognitive enrichment in older adults-a mixed-methods randomized controlled trial.

Pauline Hotterbeex, Jannique G Z van Uffelen, Julie Latomme, Melanie Beeckman, Stef Van Puyenbroeck, Sebastien Chastin, Greet Cardon

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pauline HotterbeexDepartment of Movement Sciences, Leuven Brain Institute (LBI), Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Jannique G Z van UffelenDepartment of Movement Sciences, Leuven Brain Institute (LBI), Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Julie LatommeDepartment of Movement and Sports Sciences, Ghent University Research for Aging Young (GRAY), Universiteit Gent, Gent, Belgium.
Melanie BeeckmanExpertise Center People & Society, Artevelde Hogeschool, Gent, Belgium.
Stef Van PuyenbroeckDepartment of Movement Sciences, Leuven Brain Institute (LBI), Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Sebastien ChastinDepartment of Movement and Sports Sciences, Ghent University Research for Aging Young (GRAY), Universiteit Gent, Gent, Belgium.
Greet CardonDepartment of Movement and Sports Sciences, Ghent University Research for Aging Young (GRAY), Universiteit Gent, Gent, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Evaluating the effects of a group-based cognitively enriched walking program (WALK+) and non-enriched walking program (WALK-only) on psychosocial well-being (as a secondary outcome) in community-dwelling older adults. Methods: A six-month randomized controlled trial was conducted, comparing WALK+, WALK-only and a passive control group. WALK+ and WALK-only involved two supervised group-based, and minimum one unsupervised walking session per week. Questionnaires on depressive symptoms, positive well-being, loneliness and social support measured psychosocial well-being at baseline, mid-intervention and post-intervention. Effects on these outcomes were assessed using linear mixed models with random intercepts. Self-perceived changes in psychosocial well-being were assessed post-intervention through a questionnaire and focus groups. Descriptive statistics were used for the questionnaire, and an inductive qualitative content analysis was conducted on the focus group data. Results: No significant intervention effects were found on depressive symptoms, positive well-being, loneliness and social support. Nevertheless, participants reported self-perceived improvements in psychological (40% of WALK+ and 56% of WALK-only participants) and social well-being (43% of WALK+ and 50% of WALK-only participants). The group sessions facilitated social connections, some lasting beyond the intervention period. Conclusions: Although no intervention effects were observed using standardized questionnaires, improvements in self-perceived psychosocial well-being suggest potential psychosocial benefits of WALK+ and WALK-only for older adults.

Indexed as

CognitionWalkingAgedAged, 80 and overDepressionFemaleHumansIndependent LivingLonelinessMaleSocial SupportSurveys and QuestionnairesCognitively enriched walkingGroup-basedInterventionMixed-methodsOlder adultsPhysical activityPsychosocial well-beingRandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID41589110
PMCPMC12832057

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.