Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41589156›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Comparison of the Cariogenic Potential of Two Sweeteners, Stevia and Aspartame, Based on Bacterial Inhibition and pH Reduction.

Reshmi J, Shaniya Sain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Reshmi JDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Government Dental College, Thiruvananthapuram, Thiruvananthapuram, IND.
Shaniya SainDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, PMS College of Dental Science and Research, Thiruvananthapuram, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aim Complete elimination of dietary sugars is impractical, especially for children. Restricting sugar intake and substituting sucrose with less cariogenic alternatives are plausible solutions. This in vitro study aimed to compare the cariogenic potential of two sweeteners, aspartame and stevia, by evaluating their bacterial inhibition capacity and the salivary pH changes produced at fixed time intervals. Methods To measure antibacterial activity, Petri plates containing 20 mL of Mueller-Hinton agar were seeded with a

Indexed as

aspartamedental carieshydrogen-ion concentrationsteviasweetening agents

Identifiers

PMID41589156
PMCPMC12831961

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.