ReviewHepatology forum2026
Use of albumin in patients with hepatic encephalopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies with trial sequential analysis.
Review in Hepatology forum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aim: Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a complication of cirrhosis and one of the most important manifestations of this disease. Intravenous albumin may have the potential to mitigate oxidative stress injury inherent to the pathogenesis of HE. Our study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of albumin for the treatment of HE. Materials and Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis using the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing albumin to placebo in patients with HE and decompensated cirrhosis. The outcomes were mortality and clinical improvement of HE. The odds ratio (OR) was used for binary outcomes and the mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes with their respective 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochran Q test and I Results: This study included four RCTs, amounting to 306 patients. There was a significant difference favoring albumin use for mortality (OR 0.44; 95% CI 0.24 to 0.79; p=0.007; I Conclusion: In patients with HE, intravenous albumin leads to HE improvement and reduced mortality, without an increase in AE rates. However, the TSA indicated that further studies are required to draw precise evidence regarding the use of albumin to reduce mortality in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.