Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41589210›Full record

ArticleHepatology forum2026

Sarcopenia as a novel biomarker for predicting TIPS outcomes in cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites: Mechanisms linking muscle loss, metabolic dysregulation, and portal hemodynamics.

Miao Li, Panpan Jin, Yi Shan, Ian Jingyu Q

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hepatology forum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Miao LiDepartment of General Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu, Anhui, China.
Panpan JinDepartment of General Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu, Anhui, China.
Yi ShanDepartment of General Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu, Anhui, China.
Ian Jingyu QDepartment of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu, Anhui, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aim: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is pivotal for refractory ascites in cirrhosis, yet many patients experience poor outcomes. Sarcopenia, a common muscle-wasting syndrome in cirrhosis, is tied to portal hypertension, but its role in TIPS efficacy remains unclear. This study aimed to assess sarcopenia's impact on post-TIPS ascites resolution, complications, and mechanisms. Materials and Methods: This retrospective multicenter study included 294 cirrhotic patients undergoing TIPS (2016-2021). Sarcopenia was defined by CT-based L3-SMI. Outcomes included ascites resolution (International Club of Ascites criteria), HE, and stent dysfunction. Analyses were adjusted for ΔPPG (PPG reduction), MELD-Na, and NLR as the inflammatory marker. Results: Sarcopenic patients had reduced odds of ascites resolution (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.28-0.63) and a higher HE risk (HR 2.48, 95% CI 1.72-3.57) versus non-sarcopenic patients. Conclusion: In this study, sarcopenia independently predicted poor TIPS outcomes, including reduced ascites resolution and increased risk of hepatic encephalopathy, through potential hemodynamic and metabolic pathways, supporting its value in personalized management. Screening for sarcopenia may help optimize TIPS candidacy and inform therapies targeting inflammation and ammonia.

Indexed as

Asciteshepatic encephalopathysarcopeniaTIPS

Identifiers

PMID41589210
PMCPMC12831978

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.