ReviewGels (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Hydrogels for Osteochondral Interface Regeneration: Biomaterial Types, Processes, and Animal Models.
Review in Gels (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engineered Injectable Hydrogel Platform for Tailoring the Osteoarthritis Microenvironment.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Subchondral Bone Regeneration of the Porcine Knee Joint Using α-TCP Biocement Enriched with Manuka Honey-Qualitative Pilot Study.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Musculoskeletal Ultrasound and Protein-Based Hydrogels: Novel Approaches for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Sports Injuries.Polymers · 2026Review
- State-of-the-Art and Next Generation Intra-Articular Implantable Biosensors for Osteoarthritis: From Analytical Limits to Operational Stability.Biosensors · 2026Review
- A 3-Dimensional Bioprinted Decellularized Umbilical Cord Matrix Patch for Enhanced Storage and Delivery of Extracellular Vesicles in Diabetic Wound Healing.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Longitudinal and radial microgradients in porosity and canal diameter in femur bone and its implications for bone regeneration and bone repair implants.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The osteochondral interface (OCI) is a structurally and functionally complex tissue whose degeneration or injury often results in poor healing and joint dysfunction due to its avascular and hypocellular nature. Conventional surgical treatments remain suboptimal, prompting growing interest in regenerative approaches, particularly with the utilization of hydrogel-based biomaterials that can mimic the extracellular matrix and support osteochondral regeneration. This study reviewed types of hydrogels, scaffold processing techniques, and animal models for OCI regeneration. Our search demonstrated that gelatin, alginate, chitosan, and hyaluronic acid were the most frequently investigated hydrogels. Layered constructs dominated current scaffold designs, while advanced methods such as 3D printing and extrusion demonstrated unique potential to create graded architectures resembling the native OCI. Rabbits were the most widely used in vivo models, though translation will require larger animal studies with clinically relevant defect sizes. Future efforts should focus on developing mechanically reinforced, biologically active, and continuously graded hydrogels, supported by standardized preclinical validation in large-animal models, to accelerate translation toward clinical solutions for osteochondral regeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.