ReviewGels (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Rational Design of Mechanically Optimized Hydrogels for Bone Tissue Engineering: A Review.
Review in Gels (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hydrogel Implementing Drug Delivery in Cranial Bone Tissue Engineering.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- Marine Algae Hydrogels as Emerging Biomaterials for Medicine.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Advanced biomaterial-based approaches for medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw.Open life sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bone tissue engineering, as an important branch of regenerative medicine, integrates multidisciplinary knowledge from cell biology, materials science, and biomechanics, aiming to develop novel biomaterials and technologies for functional repair and regeneration of bone tissue. Hydrogels are among the most commonly used scaffold materials; however, conventional hydrogels exhibit significant limitations in physical properties such as strength, tensile strength, toughness, and fatigue resistance, which severely restrict their application in load-bearing bone defect repair. As a result, the development of high-strength hydrogels has become a research hotspot in the field of bone tissue engineering. This paper systematically reviews the latest research progress in this area: First, it delves into the physicochemical characteristics of high-strength hydrogels at the molecular level, focusing on core features such as their crosslinking network structure, dynamic bonding mechanisms, and energy dissipation principles. Next, it categorically summarizes novel high-strength hydrogel systems and different types of biomimetic hydrogels developed based on various reinforcement strategies. Furthermore, it provides a detailed evaluation of the application effects of these advanced materials in specific anatomical sites, including cranial reconstruction, femoral repair, alveolar bone regeneration, and articular cartilage repair. This review aims to provide systematic theoretical guidance and technical references for the basic research and clinical translation of high-strength hydrogels in bone tissue engineering, promoting the effective translation of this field from laboratory research to clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.