ReviewDiseases (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Tailored Therapeutic Strategies for Fetuses, Neonates, Pediatrics, Geriatrics, Athletes, and Critical Cases in the Era of Personalized Medicine.
Review in Diseases (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Developmental Programming of Drug Response: Microbiota as a Missing Dimension in Perinatal Drug Discovery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Deep learning for genomic insights into athletic performance in sports education.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Precision medicine, which relies on genomic, multi-omic, phenotypic, and environmental data, has the potential to transform healthcare from population-focused heuristics to individualized prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. Moreover, recent advances in sequencing, molecular profiles, wearable sensors, and machine learning have created opportunities for rapid translational innovation: rapid genomic diagnosis in neonatal and paediatric rare diseases, targeted oncology, pharmacogenomic-based prescribing strategies, and individual sport performance. Nevertheless, the vast majority of innovations remain in centers of specialism or pilot programs, rather than routinely or equitably integrated into clinical or athletic practice. This narrative review synthesizes translational evidence across the life course-in pregnancy, paediatrics, adult medicine, geriatrics, and sportomics-to find reproducible clinical and performance examples which enable precision-based alternative approaches to management, outcome, or preparation; and to reshape those examples into pragmatic, scalable priorities which minimize inequity, and maximize benefit. We undertook a structured narrative synthesis of peer-reviewed literature, trials, clinician translation programs, implementation studies, and sportomics reports, prioritizing examples that demonstrate utility, reproducibility, and impact. Important findings suggest that multi-omics and rapid sequencing improve diagnostic yield and time to diagnosis. Molecular profiling and circulating tumor DNA help realize adaptive treatment selection. Integrated genomics, metabolomics, wearable physiology, and AI analytics facilitate individualized training, injury-risk stratification, and recovery optimization. But systematic value is limited by insufficient representative validation, dataset bias, poor interoperability, regulatory uncertainty, workforce preparedness, and inequities of access. Converting a promise into population- and performance-level value requires coordinated action across four fronts: representative validation; interoperable, privacy-preserving infrastructures; clinician- and coach-centered implementation; and templates for scalable, cost-sensitive deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.