ReviewBiosensors2025
Active Rehabilitation Technologies for Post-Stroke Patients.
Review in Biosensors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of Sensory- Motor Integration Training on Activities of Daily Living in Children with Erb's Palsy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions · 2026Trial
- A Muscle Fiber-Based Soft Hand Exoskeleton Control Strategy for Fine Manipulation: A Preliminary Investigation.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Neuromorphic Technologies for Neuroengineering: From Adaptive Stimulation to SNN-Based Inference and Deployable Biointerfaces.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neuroplasticity-based active movement opens an avenue for functional recovery in post-stroke patients. Active rehabilitation techniques have attracted wide attention based on their abilities to enhance patient involvement, facilitate precise personalized intervention, and provide comprehensive treatment via cross-domain approaches. Emerging evidence suggests that active rehabilitation methods can respond to patients' motor intentions in real-time and significantly increase motivation and engagement, leading to efficient utilization of critical recovery windows and better rehabilitation outcomes. In this review, we focus on the physiological basis of active rehabilitation, including mechanisms of neuroplasticity, and discuss recent advances in intent detection and feedback devices. We also examine treatment options for different stages of stroke recovery, providing a comprehensive reference for engineers to design optimized rehabilitation techniques and for clinicians to select appropriate rehabilitation protocols. These developments create new opportunities to improve the lives of stroke patients and offer greater hope for their recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.