ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2025
Targeted Hepatic Delivery of Bioactive Molecules via Nanovesicles: Recent Developments and Emerging Directions.
Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Liver fibrosis: Pathogenesis and innovative nanoparticle-based therapeutic strategies.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2026Review
- Regulatory roles and translational potential of the Kruppel-like factor family in liver disease.iLIVER · 2026Review
- Precision Lipid Management in the Era of Biotechnology and Artificial Intelligence: From Gene Editing to Smart Drug Delivery.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2026Review
- Engineered small extracellular vesicles in hematologic malignancies: mechanisms, therapeutic strategies, and translational challenges.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Review
- Exosomes serve as natural nanocarriers targeting cancer stem cells to advance precision oncology.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Hepatotropic Nanomedicine and Targeted Nanocarriers for Liver Diseases and Hepatocellular Carcinoma.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Liver diseases, including fibrosis, viral hepatitis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and monogenic genetic disorders, represent a major global health burden with limited therapeutic options and frequent systemic toxicity from conventional treatments. Nanovesicle-based drug and gene delivery systems offer targeted approaches that may improve therapeutic precision and reduce off-target effects. This review aims to evaluate the promise and comparative potential of three key nanovesicle platforms-lipid nanoparticles (LNPs), extracellular vesicles (EVs) and liposomes-for drug and gene delivery in liver disease therapy. A systematic search of peer-reviewed studies published in electronic databases was performed, focusing on preclinical and clinical research investigating the use of LNPs, EVs and liposomes for hepatic drug or gene delivery. Studies were analyzed for vesicle composition, targeting efficiency, payload capacity, therapeutic outcomes, and reported limitations. The analysis indicates that LNPs demonstrate strong efficiency in nucleic acid encapsulation and delivery, supported by growing clinical translation. EVs show promising biocompatibility and innate targeting to hepatic cells but face challenges in large-scale production and standardization. Liposomes remain versatile and well-characterized platforms capable of carrying diverse therapeutic molecules, though rapid clearance can limit their efficacy. Together, these nanovesicle systems hold considerable potential for advancing targeted drug and gene therapies in liver disease. Future work should focus on improving stability, manufacturing scalability, and cell-specific targeting to support clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.