ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2026
Emerging Molecular and Computational Biomarkers in Urothelial Carcinoma: Innovations in Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Therapeutic Response Prediction.
Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification and Functional Analysis of Targets of Dehydrodiisoeugenol in Bladder Cancer Based on Chemoproteomics-Based Profiling.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Complement tumor-crosstalk: the role of C5a receptors in urothelial carcinomas.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Immunotherapy role in bladder cancer treatment: a review of literature.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bladder cancer (BC) represents a major global health issue with high recurrence and significant mortality rates in cases of advanced disease. Currently, the development of molecular profiling, liquid biopsy technologies, and artificial intelligence (AI) software has resulted in unprecedented opportunities to improve diagnosis, prognostic assessment, and treatment selection. Recent multicenter studies have identified emerging metabolomic, proteomic, and genomic biomarkers with high sensitivity and specificity that may help replace or complement invasive approaches. AI-driven models that combine multi-omics datasets with radiomics and clinical parameters have demonstrated improved accuracy for predicting both therapeutic response and long-term outcomes, compared to standard approaches for risk stratification. Additionally, the incremental clinical usefulness of liquid biopsy platforms has been demonstrated for the monitoring of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer and minimal disease detection. As these innovations converge, they herald the advent of a new era of personalized management of urothelial carcinoma; however, broad-based clinical implementation will require large-scale validation, standardization, regulatory harmonization, and economic analyses. Background: Bladder cancer continues to be a global health problem, particularly in the advanced disease setting where treatment options are limited, and mortality remains high. The exciting advances in precision medicine, including breakthrough molecular profiling techniques, liquid biopsy, and opportunities to apply AI to interpret these molecular data, hold unprecedented promise in improving the accuracy of diagnosis, prognostic stratification, and therapeutic decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.