Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41590605›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2026

Circulating Tumor Cells in Uveal Melanoma: Multi-Marker Detection and Association With Disease State.

Daniel P de Bruyn, Fabiana Lucia Bassil, Mike Wu, Aaron B Beasley, Jolanda Vaarwater, Mai N Van, Jaco Kraan, Robert M Verdijk, Dion Paridaens, Caroline M van Rij and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Daniel P de BruynDepartment of Ophthalmology, Erasmus MC, The Netherlands.
Fabiana Lucia BassilDepartment of Ophthalmology, Erasmus MC, The Netherlands.
Mike WuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Erasmus MC, The Netherlands.
Aaron B BeasleyCentre for Precision Health, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia.
Jolanda VaarwaterDepartment of Ophthalmology, Erasmus MC, The Netherlands.
Mai N VanDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Erasmus MC, The Netherlands.
Jaco KraanDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Erasmus MC, The Netherlands.
Robert M VerdijkDepartment of Pathology, Section Ophthalmic Pathology, Erasmus MC, The Netherlands.
Dion ParidaensThe Eye Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Caroline M van RijDepartment of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC, The Netherlands.
Nicole C NausDepartment of Ophthalmology, Erasmus MC, The Netherlands.
Annelies de KleinDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, The Netherlands.
Elin S GrayCentre for Precision Health, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia.
Erwin BrosensDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, The Netherlands.
Emine KiliçDepartment of Ophthalmology, Erasmus MC, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Uveal melanoma (UM) is primarily treated with eye-sparing radiotherapy, leaving limited tumor tissue for molecular analysis. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) may offer a minimally invasive alternative for genomic tumor profiling. This pilot study evaluated the feasibility of a multi-marker CTC capture approach in UM patients at diagnosis, during fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (fSRT), and at metastatic progression. Methods: Patients with localized or metastatic UM were prospectively enrolled. Peripheral blood samples were collected at baseline, during fSRT, and on detection of metastases. CTCs were captured and enumerated using a multi-marker approach and fluorescence microscopy. Results: A total of 76 patients were included: 68 with localized disease and eight with metastatic disease. Four patients presented initially with localized disease but developed metastasis during follow-up: for comparisons, only metastatic-stage samples were used, yielding 64 localized and 12 metastatic samples. CTCs were detected in 69.1% of patients with localized disease at baseline and in 83.3% of those with metastases. CTC counts were significantly higher in metastatic disease than in localized disease (median = 8 vs. 3; P = 0.010). Among patients undergoing fSRT, paired analysis showed a significant increase in CTC counts between day 3 and day 5 (median = 1 vs. 4; P = 0.007). No significant associations were observed between baseline CTC counts and tumor thickness, largest basal diameter, tumor volume, American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor stage, tumor location, or molecular risk class. Conclusions: Multi-marker CTC detection in UM patients is feasible across disease stages. Increased CTC counts during fSRT may offer a window for molecular characterization. Larger studies with longitudinal blood sampling are needed to validate clinical and prognostic utility.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorMelanomaNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingUveal NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCell CountDisease ProgressionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMicroscopy, FluorescenceMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID41590605
PMCPMC12859728

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.