ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2026
Circulating Tumor Cells in Uveal Melanoma: Multi-Marker Detection and Association With Disease State.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Uveal melanoma (UM) is primarily treated with eye-sparing radiotherapy, leaving limited tumor tissue for molecular analysis. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) may offer a minimally invasive alternative for genomic tumor profiling. This pilot study evaluated the feasibility of a multi-marker CTC capture approach in UM patients at diagnosis, during fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (fSRT), and at metastatic progression. Methods: Patients with localized or metastatic UM were prospectively enrolled. Peripheral blood samples were collected at baseline, during fSRT, and on detection of metastases. CTCs were captured and enumerated using a multi-marker approach and fluorescence microscopy. Results: A total of 76 patients were included: 68 with localized disease and eight with metastatic disease. Four patients presented initially with localized disease but developed metastasis during follow-up: for comparisons, only metastatic-stage samples were used, yielding 64 localized and 12 metastatic samples. CTCs were detected in 69.1% of patients with localized disease at baseline and in 83.3% of those with metastases. CTC counts were significantly higher in metastatic disease than in localized disease (median = 8 vs. 3; P = 0.010). Among patients undergoing fSRT, paired analysis showed a significant increase in CTC counts between day 3 and day 5 (median = 1 vs. 4; P = 0.007). No significant associations were observed between baseline CTC counts and tumor thickness, largest basal diameter, tumor volume, American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor stage, tumor location, or molecular risk class. Conclusions: Multi-marker CTC detection in UM patients is feasible across disease stages. Increased CTC counts during fSRT may offer a window for molecular characterization. Larger studies with longitudinal blood sampling are needed to validate clinical and prognostic utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.