ArticleJournal of functional biomaterials2026
Electrostatic Patterning of Nanofibrous Microcapsules for Three-Dimensional Cell Culture.
Article in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advanced Technologies for Processing Functional Biomaterials.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Three-dimensional biomaterial scaffolds with controlled geometry and surface nanoarchitecture are essential for advancing polymer processing strategies in tissue engineering. Conventional electrospinning generates nanofibrous structures but has limited ability to reproduce defined three-dimensional shapes or achieve high pattern fidelity. This study aimed to develop a scalable processing method for producing biodegradable scaffolds with precisely controlled microstructure and geometry using phase separation-assisted electrospray. Poly (lactic acid) microcapsules with tunable diameters and porous nanofibrous surfaces were fabricated under controlled humidity and deposited onto conductive molds to obtain two- and three-dimensional scaffold shapes. The manufacturing process required only simple electrospray equipment and static molds, without mechanically complex collectors or moving stages. The resulting scaffolds replicated mold features with resolutions down to 200 μm and achieved thickness up to 600 μm. The nanofibrous microcapsule surfaces supported strong adhesion and metabolic activity of HepG2 cells, while cellular penetration into deeper scaffold regions remained limited to approximately 80 μm. These findings indicate that electrospray-mediated microcapsule deposition is a practical polymer-processing approach that integrates nanofibrous surface formation with mold-defined shaping, offering a reproducible and scalable method for fabricating structurally precise and biologically compatible three-dimensional scaffolds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.