ArticleJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2025
Etiology of Coronary Reintervention After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
(1) Background: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) reduces the risk of target vessel revascularization compared to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), yet coronary reintervention may still occur. This study aims to evaluate the incidence and underlying etiology of reintervention after CABG. (2) Methods: A single-center retrospective cohort study of all patients undergoing isolated CABG (January 2016-December 2021) was performed. Surgical or percutaneous reinterventions were analyzed until December 2022 using institutional data linked to the Netherlands Heart Registration (NHR) and chart review. (3) Results: Amongst 4814 patients, 8.7% (n = 418) underwent coronary reintervention during a median 4.5 [3.8-4.8] year follow-up. Causes of reintervention included graft failure (64.6%), progression of coronary artery disease (20.3%), incomplete revascularization (10.5%), or combined factors (4.1%). Mortality did not differ significantly between reintervention and non-reintervention groups (10.8% vs. 7.9%,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.