Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41590926›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2026

Calibrated Transformer Fusion for Dual-View Low-Energy CESM Classification.

Ahmed A H Alkurdi, Amira Bibo Sallow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ahmed A H AlkurdiDepartment of Information Technology, Technical College of Duhok, Duhok Polytechnic University, Duhok 42001, Iraq.ORCID 0000-0002-8060-4087
Amira Bibo SallowDepartment of Information Technology, Technical College of Duhok, Duhok Polytechnic University, Duhok 42001, Iraq.ORCID 0000-0002-5102-6193

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) provides low-energy images acquired in standard craniocaudal (CC) and mediolateral oblique (MLO) views, and clinical interpretation relies on integrating both views. This study proposes a dual-view classification framework that combines deep CNN feature extraction with transformer-based fusion for breast-side classification using low-energy (DM) images from CESM acquisitions (Normal vs. Tumorous; benign and malignant merged). The evaluation was conducted using 5-fold stratified group cross-validation with patient-level grouping to prevent leakage across folds. The final configuration (Model E) integrates dual-backbone feature extraction, transformer fusion, MC-dropout inference for uncertainty estimation, and post hoc logistic calibration. Across the five held-out test folds, Model E achieved a mean accuracy of 96.88% ± 2.39% and a mean F1-score of 97.68% ± 1.66%. The mean ROC-AUC and PR-AUC were 0.9915 ± 0.0098 and 0.9968 ± 0.0029, respectively. Probability quality was supported by a mean Brier score of 0.0236 ± 0.0145 and a mean expected calibration error (ECE) of 0.0334 ± 0.0171. An ablation study (Models A-E) was also reported to quantify the incremental contribution of dual-view input, transformer fusion, and uncertainty calibration. Within the limits of this retrospective single-center setting, these results suggest that dual-view transformer fusion can provide strong discrimination while also producing calibrated probabilities and uncertainty outputs that are relevant for decision support.

Indexed as

breast abnormality detectioncontrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM)deep learningdual-view fusionmedical image analysistransformeruncertainty estimation

Identifiers

PMID41590926
PMCPMC12842785

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.