ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026
Machine learning-based models for intraoperative blood loss of retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIntraoperative blood loss (IBL) is a critical precipitating factor of intraoperative and postoperative complications. This study aims to identify risk factors and employ machine learning (ML) techniques to develop models for predicting IBL in patients undergo retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy (RLA).
methodsA retrospective study was performed with data from patients who underwent unilateral RLA at Beijing Anzhen Hospital from 2014 to 2021. The data were randomly divided into training and validation sets. A volume ≥ 100 ml was defined as high IBL. Model training incorporated feature selection with least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and algorithms including logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), neural network (NN), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), support vector machine (SVM) and AdaBoost. Various indicators were utilized to evaluate model performance.
resultsA total of 530 RLA cases were included. LASSO regression identified gender, surgeons' experience, disease type, lesion diameter and lesion location as predictive factors. Six ML models were derived and evaluated. Among which, LR, RF and NN models exhibited exceptional discriminatory power. The area under the curve (AUC) of the three models were 0.775, 0.769, 0.729 in the validation set, respectively. A nomogram and a online calculator were created. The calibration curve, decision curve analysis and clinical impact curve revealed its excellent clinical utility.
conclusionThis study presented and compared the use of various ML models for predicting IBL in RLA, which could assist in assessing surgical risks and tailored treatments without additional examination, and providing insights for the clinical application of ML.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41591513What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.