Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41591684›Full record

ArticleLearning & behavior2026

Focused and distributed: Diverse attentional profiles in pigeon category learning.

Leyre Castro, Ananya Albrecht-Buehler, Edward A Wasserman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Learning & behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Leyre CastroDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA. leyre-castroruiz@uiowa.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2509-933X
Ananya Albrecht-BuehlerDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.
Edward A WassermanDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attention to relevant information is necessary to solve a categorization task. Prior studies monitoring peck location indicated that pigeons narrowly focus their attention on the relevant features of a category exemplar, whereas computational modeling suggested that pigeons' attention can be widely distributed. To help resolve these apparently contradictory results, we deployed both strategies - peck tracking and computational modeling - in the same experiment. Pigeons' peck-tracking scores neatly aligned with their category choices and with the results of the computational modeling. In addition, pigeons displayed distinctive learning and attentional patterns during training and testing. Half of our pigeons showed preferential, even exclusive, use of the most relevant category features, but the other half were inclined to use several of the available features. These results highlight the importance of combining an individual differences approach along with the pursuit of general cognitive principles.

Indexed as

AttentionColumbidaeConcept FormationLearningAnimalsIndividualityAnimal cognitionAttentionCategorizationIndividual differencesPigeons

Identifiers

PMID41591684
PMCPMC13538260

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.