ArticlePloS one2026
Illness explanatory models of depression among young people in low-resource settings: A qualitative study in Ghana and Zimbabwe.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The African youth in mind (Y-MIND) brief psychological intervention for depression among school-going adolescents in Ghana: a development case series.BMC psychiatry · 2026Trial
- Hidden distress: a qualitative study of sociocultural barriers to mental health help-seeking among young people in Zimbabwe.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDepression among young people is a global public health issue, particularly common in low-resource settings like Ghana and Zimbabwe. Affecting around 10% of young people, depression often emerges between ages 15 and 24 and remains largely untreated due to stigma, limited resources, and cultural beliefs. This study explored the explanatory models of depression among Ghanaian and Zimbabwean young people, from the perspectives of young people, caregivers, healthcare workers, teachers, and community leaders, including policymakers, traditional and faith-based healers, to inform culturally relevant interventions.
methodsQualitative interviews were conducted in Ghana and Zimbabwe. Using purposive sampling, 133 semi-structured interviews and six focus group discussions were conducted with 53 participants, including young people aged 15-24 with lived experience of depression, high school students, caregivers, community leaders, teachers, and healthcare workers. Data were thematically analysed using NVivo 14 software to identify key patterns and themes.
findingsYoung people's understanding and help-seeking behaviours reflected both emic and etic influences. Emic aspects included culturally shaped explanatory models shared by families, teachers, peers, and communities, including local idioms of distress and spiritual beliefs. Socio-economic stressors like poverty, family conflict, and academic pressure, though universally experienced, were often interpreted through culturally embedded narratives like spiritual causation, thus reflecting emic framing in participants' accounts and influencing help-seeking in both countries. Etic aspects were evident in symptom descriptions aligning with behavioural (social withdrawal), emotional (sadness), cognitive (suicidal thoughts), and physical (fatigue) categories. Initial support was often sought from spiritual leaders, peers, and school-based resources.
conclusionThis study provides a culturally grounded understanding of how young people in Ghana and Zimbabwe conceptualise depression, shaped by both emic and etic influences. Participants described depression using local idioms and spiritual explanations, while also recognising biomedical symptoms and socio-economic stressors. These findings underscore the need for interventions that integrate traditional beliefs with evidence-based approaches. Implementing multi-stakeholder approaches that engage families, schools, and spiritual leaders may be critical in reducing stigma, improving care access, and enhancing depression outcomes for young people.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.