Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41592140›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2026

Learning cardiac activation and repolarization times with operator learning.

Giovanni Ziarelli, Edoardo Centofanti, Nicola Parolini, Simone Scacchi, Marco Verani, Luca F Pavarino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Giovanni ZiarelliDipartimento di Matematica, Università di Milano, Milano, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0324-2067
Edoardo CentofantiDipartimento di Matematica, Università di Pavia, Pavia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6834-0982
Nicola ParoliniMOX Laboratory - Dipartimento di Matematica, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy.
Simone ScacchiDipartimento di Matematica, Università di Milano, Milano, Italy.
Marco VeraniMOX Laboratory - Dipartimento di Matematica, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy.
Luca F PavarinoDipartimento di Matematica, Università di Pavia, Pavia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Solving partial or ordinary differential equation models in cardiac electrophysiology is a computationally demanding task, particularly when high-resolution meshes are required to capture the complex dynamics of the heart. Moreover, in clinical applications, it is essential to employ computational tools that provide only relevant information, ensuring clarity and ease of interpretation. In this work, we exploit two recently proposed operator learning approaches, namely Fourier Neural Operators (FNO) and Kernel Operator Learning (KOL), to learn the operator mapping the applied stimulus in the physical domain into the activation and repolarization time distributions. These data-driven methods are evaluated on synthetic 2D and 3D domains, as well as on a physiologically realistic left ventricle geometry. Notably, while the learned map between the applied current and activation time has its modeling counterpart in the Eikonal model, no equivalent partial differential equation (PDE) model is known for the map between the applied current and repolarization time. Our results demonstrate that both FNO and KOL approaches are robust to hyperparameter choices and computationally efficient compared to traditional PDE-based Monodomain models. These findings highlight the potential use of these surrogate operators to accelerate cardiac simulations and facilitate their clinical integration.

Indexed as

HeartMachine LearningModels, CardiovascularAlgorithmsComputational BiologyComputer SimulationFourier AnalysisHumans

Identifiers

PMID41592140
PMCPMC12858077

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.