Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41592299›Full record

ArticleJMIR human factors2026

Acceptability of a Digital Care App in Patients Undergoing Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: Prospective Cohort Study.

Yacine Louni, Matthew Laroche, Abdulrhman Alnasser, Mohammad Abuhaneya, Eric Belzile, Sandhya Baskaran, Jennifer Mutch, Anthony Albers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR human factors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yacine LouniFaculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-6235-5275
Matthew LarocheFaculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-4818-6338
Abdulrhman AlnasserDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGill University, St Mary's Hospital, 3830 Avenue Lacombe, Montreal, QC, H3T 0A2, Canada, +1 514-345-3511 ext 3282.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5294-0975
Mohammad AbuhaneyaDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGill University, St Mary's Hospital, 3830 Avenue Lacombe, Montreal, QC, H3T 0A2, Canada, +1 514-345-3511 ext 3282.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3951-1863
Eric BelzileSt Mary's Hospital Research Center, St Mary's Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-3068-3517
Sandhya BaskaranSt Mary's Hospital Research Center, St Mary's Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4295-7738
Jennifer MutchDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGill University, St Mary's Hospital, 3830 Avenue Lacombe, Montreal, QC, H3T 0A2, Canada, +1 514-345-3511 ext 3282.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5014-1755
Anthony AlbersDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGill University, St Mary's Hospital, 3830 Avenue Lacombe, Montreal, QC, H3T 0A2, Canada, +1 514-345-3511 ext 3282.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8456-6209

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Mobile health (mHealth) apps have become more commonly used in orthopedics. However, for these apps to be efficient, patients should be willing to use them, making it essential to understand patients' perspectives of mHealth interventions. Objective: The aim of this single-center, intent-to-treat, preoperative single-cohort study of 100 patients was to evaluate the acceptability of mymobility (Zimmer-Biomet), an mHealth app designed for the postoperative care of total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods: We measured acceptability using the theoretical framework for acceptability (TFA) preoperatively and at 3 months post operation. We also measured satisfaction with app use postoperatively using the Usefulness, Satisfaction, and Ease of Use questionnaire as well as patient-reported outcome measures preoperatively and postoperatively using the Oxford hip and knee scores and the visual analog scale for pain. Patients included were 18 years or older; underwent unilateral primary total hip, total knee, or partial knee arthroplasty; spoke and read French or English; and had a smartphone with internet access. Participants used mymobility in addition to standard government-funded physiotherapy. Results: The preoperative overall TFA result was 4.2 out of 5, but results decreased significantly postoperatively. There was higher self-efficacy in preoperative TFAs with higher education, and lower acceptability in postoperative TFAs with TKA. The Usefulness, Satisfaction, and Ease of Use questionnaire revealed a good level of satisfaction with the use of the app. Patient-reported outcome measures showed earlier improvement in THA (31.2 d) than in TKA (89.4 d), whereas the visual analog scale showed a rapid decrease in pain with both procedures. Only 1 patient expressed privacy concerns with the use of the app. Conclusions: There was a good level of acceptability with the use of mymobility for the postoperative management of THA and TKA, although acceptability decreased postoperatively. This decrease could signify high expectations toward the app preoperatively or higher than expected difficulty and pain in the early postoperative period. Acceptability tended to increase with higher education and decrease with TKA. These trends are consistent with prior literature and constitute a potential gap to address for app developers. The influence of the natural recovery process on acceptability remains unclear. Future studies could explore this gap by comparing results in cohorts using the app to cohorts with standard care.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeMobile ApplicationsPatient Acceptance of Health CareAgedCohort StudiesDigital HealthFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionProspective StudiesSurveys and Questionnairesmobile healthorthopedicspatient satisfactiontelemedicinetelerehabilitationtotal joint arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID41592299
PMCPMC12844828

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.