Key challenges in cost-effectiveness analyses of emerging MASLD therapies: adherence, adverse events, cardiometabolic benefits, and age-related uncertainty: Correspondence to editorial on "Evaluating treatment response thresholds for cost-effective treatment in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease".

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

1. CHAIN Cohort: Prospective Multicenter Study of MASLD With Serial Liver Stiffness Assessments in Cardiovascular Care.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  A cost-effectiveness evaluation framework for treatment for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis: Potential and concerns: Editorial on "Evaluating treatment response thresholds for cost-effective treatment in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease".2026

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as