Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41592831›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Development and validation of a two-stage machine learning model for personalised type 2 diabetes screening in the All of Us Research Program and UK Biobank.

Ahmed Khattab, Shang-Fu Chen, Hossein Javedani Sadaei, Nathan E Wineinger, Ali Torkamani

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ahmed KhattabScripps Research, La Jolla, California, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7253-199X
Shang-Fu ChenScripps Research, La Jolla, California, USA.
Hossein Javedani SadaeiScripps Research, La Jolla, California, USA.
Nathan E WineingerScripps Research, La Jolla, California, USA.
Ali TorkamaniScripps Research, La Jolla, California, USA atorkama@scripps.edu.

Funding

Genotype First: Actionable Genetic Risk through Genotype-to-Phenotype PredictionR01HG010881 · NHGRI · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI TORKAMANI, ALI · 2020 to 2023
$3.1M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG010881
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop and externally validate a two-stage machine learning framework that integrates polygenic risk and clinical variables for early identification of individuals at risk of developing type 2 diabetes.

methodsWe conducted a prospective prediction study using data from the All of Us Research Program for model development and the UK Biobank for external validation. Two models were constructed. Stage 1 used gradient boosted decision trees (XGBoost) with cross validation, automated hyperparameter optimisation and class weighting to predict 5-year incident type 2 diabetes using demographic, clinical and polygenic predictors. Stage 2 incorporated glycated haemoglobin or fasting glucose measurements to refine risk estimates. Model interpretation used SHapley Additive exPlanations values and permutation importance, and logistic regression and random forest models served as comparators. Discrimination of all models was compared using the DeLong test.

resultsThe Stage 1 model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.81 in All of Us and 0.82 in UK Biobank, performing significantly better than the phenotype-only model in UK Biobank (DeLong p=1.05×10⁻⁷⁶). Higher polygenic risk quartiles were associated with increased incidence of type 2 diabetes in both cohorts (global χ

conclusionA two-stage machine learning framework that integrates genetic and clinical information can support personalised screening for type 2 diabetes across diverse populations. The approach demonstrated robust performance across cohorts and offers a practical structure for early risk identification.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Machine LearningAgedBiological Specimen BanksBlood GlucoseBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsClassification AlgorithmsFemaleGenetic Risk ScoreGlycated HemoglobinHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPrediction AlgorithmsBlood GlucoseGlycated HemoglobinDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Primary PreventionRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID41592831
PMCPMC12853511

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.