ArticleeNeuro2026
Hierarchical Distribution of Reward Representation in the Cortical and Hippocampal Regions.
Article in eNeuro, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dopaminergic inputs to various brain regions, such as the striatum, orbitofrontal cortex, and amygdala, play a critical role in processing reward acquisition information. While reward-related activity is also observed more broadly in motor, parietal, and hippocampal regions, the functional significance and potential hierarchy of reward-related representation across these latter areas remain unclear. We investigated this by quantifying neural predictive power using machine learning. Specifically, neural activity was examined in six brain areas-the primary and secondary motor cortices (M1 and M2), posterior parietal cortex (PPC), dorsal and ventral CA1 (dCA1 and vCA1), and lateral entorhinal cortex (LEC)-in male rats performing a self-initiated left-right choice task. Machine learning models classified rewarded versus nonrewarded trials based on neuronal firing properties significantly above chance for all regions. Crucially, classification revealed a clear performance gradient, forming a functional hierarchy: models using hippocampal data (dCA1 and vCA1) performed best, followed by LEC and PPC, with M1 and M2 performing lowest. Furthermore, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis revealed a qualitative transformation in coding strategies along this hierarchy: while neocortical regions relied on subtle, distributed high-order statistics, the hippocampus utilized precise, categorical representations. At this apex, distinct strategies emerged: dCA1 primarily utilized temporally precise post-reward spike distributions with transient increase of response, while vCA1 integrated both spike timing and firing rate changes with suppressive response. These findings provide quantitative evidence for a functionally hierarchical and qualitative evolution of reward-related representation, highlighting distinct roles of dCA1 and vCA1 in encoding reward-related events to potentially guide future behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.