ArticleScientific reports2026
Integrating machine learning and physics-based modeling for predictive design of gemcitabine-loaded nanocomposites.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Machine-Learning-Driven Molecular Design and Structure-Property-Performance Relationships in Pharmaceutical Chemistry.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to develop a machine learning framework to predict loading efficiency and encapsulation efficiency in gemcitabine-loaded nanocomposites, thereby overcoming the limitations of purely experimental approaches. A curated dataset of 59 experimental formulations, augmented with 200 physics-informed synthetic data points, was used to train and compare multiple machine learning algorithms. A Physics-Informed Machine Learning algorithm incorporated interactions between drugs and polymers, as well as kinetic release. Model performance was evaluated using the coefficient of determination, root mean square error, and mean absolute error, along with SHapley Additive exPlanations values to assess the influence of individual variables. The XGBoost algorithm yielded the highest value of prediction accuracy, with a coefficient of determination of 0.89 for Loading Efficiency and 0.91 for Encapsulation Efficiency. Nanoparticle size and zeta potential emerged as important features. Physics-Informed Machine Learning allowed for increased interpretability and generability of models. A suitable design space that led to good performance was determined to be in the range of 80-150 nm for size and + 15 to + 25 mV for zeta potential. This work presents a new machine learning / Physics-Informed Machine Learning framework that is a valuable asset when designing nanocarriers in a rational manner. This framework enables one to accelerate research and decrease costs related to experimentation. Overall, this work presents a promising in silico framework that can guide the rational improvement of nanomedicine formulations, pending experimental validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.