ArticleBMC genomics2026
Multicondition expression profiling reveals limitations of canonical housekeeping genes.
Article in BMC genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Housekeeping genes are commonly used as reference genes for analyzing expression data. We introduce an algorithm that scores and ranks genes based on their expression ubiquity using three criteria: the proportion of samples with high expression, overall expression levels, and expression invariance. The resulting continuous and configurable measure of gene ubiquity overcomes the limitations of current categorical classifications.Using this measure, we systematically evaluate how genes traditionally assumed to be ubiquitously expressed (so-called stable housekeeping genes) respond to drugs. By integrating expression data from the Genotype-Tissue Expression portal (physiological conditions) and the Connectivity Map (drug effects), we identify subsets of genes that maintain strong invariance under chemical stimuli, rendering them particularly suitable as reference genes. At the same time, we show that many seemingly ubiquitous genes are strongly influenced by commonly used drugs. Our findings open up new conceptual perspectives on drug mechanisms and cellular regulatory responses and they call into question the reliability of several classic housekeeping genes.To facilitate broader application of these results, we present an interactive web interface ( https://ubigen.uni-rostock.de ) that allows researchers to explore gene rankings, adjust scoring criteria and analyze specific gene sets. This platform facilitates the selection of robust, ubiquitously expressed reference genes for experimental applications and deepens our understanding of transcriptional regulation under physiological and chemically perturbed conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.