ArticleBMC public health2026
The relationship between health literacy and public trust in the health system: evidence from an Iranian setting.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTrust is an essential aspect of human relations. In health, trust refers to an effective relationship between service recipients and service providers. Besides trust, health literacy can improve a person’s health decisions. This study was implemented to measure health literacy and public trust among clients referring to the healthcare centers of Khalkhal, Iran.
methodA descriptive-analytical study was conducted in the northwest of Iran. Demographic, public trust, and health literacy questionnaires were used to collect data. The data were analyzed using SPSS 26. Linear regression was also used to examine the relationship between the total score of health literacy and public trust and its domains, adjusting for demographic variables.
resultsA total of 809 people participated in the study. The mean score of public trust was 110.27 (SD = 10.27), and the mean score of health literacy was 117.36 (SD = 12.70). A statistically significant relationship was found between health literacy and public trust with the variables of gender, marital status, supplementary insurance, residence, economic status, education, and age (P < 0.05). A weak statistically significant correlation was found between health literacy and public trust score (r = 0.08, P = 0.02). Based on the linear regression model, health literacy was considered as a public trust predictor (β = 0.008, P < 0.05).
conclusionThe results confirm that health literacy is positively associated with trust in the healthcare system. Implementing practical health literacy programs across various societal levels can foster a health-literate environment. Also, it is suggested that more focus be placed on important factors to enhance public trust, including appropriate planning, coordination in service provision, improving the knowledge of service providers, respecting patient rights, establishing justice, and increasing the quality of service.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.