Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41593580›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2026

Quiet quitting in nursing: a concept analysis.

Rostam Jalali, Samira Fatahi, Ameneh Amiri Kolehjoubi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rostam JalaliKermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.
Samira FatahiStudents Research Committee, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.
Ameneh Amiri KolehjoubiStudents Research Committee, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran. amenehamiri71@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundQuiet quitting is an emerging concept in human resource management and occupational psychology, defined as a form of psychological and behavioral withdrawal from work without formal resignation. In nursing, this phenomenon has gained attention due to its potential impact on workforce engagement, job satisfaction, and quality of patient care. Understanding and clarifying the concept of quiet quitting is important for developing effective managerial and supportive strategies aimed at prevention and intervention. This study aims to clarify the idea of quiet quitting in nurses.

methodsA concept analysis was conducted using the Walker and Avant approach. A comprehensive review of literature was performed across the databases PubMed, Google Scholar, Science Direct, and CINAHL, employing keywords such as Nurses, Quiet Quitting, Nursing Staff, and Job Disengagement, without language restrictions, covering the years 2020 to 2025.

resultsA total of 129 articles and texts were initially identified, of which 16 met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. The findings indicate that quiet quitting is characterized by reduced engagement, performing only minimum tasks, avoidance of additional responsibilities, and organizational indifference. Ultimately, these behaviors lead to decreased effort, motivation, and creativity, resulting in halted professional growth among nurses, increased turnover intention, reduced care quality, and job dissatisfaction.

conclusionThe concept analysis of quiet quitting reveals that this phenomenon reflects a decline in job commitment despite apparent employment retention, which can negatively impact care quality and organizational productivity. Recognizing its components is a critical step toward formulating effective managerial interventions to prevent its adverse consequences.

Indexed as

Concept analysisNursesQuiet quittingWalker and Avant’s method

Identifiers

PMID41593580
PMCPMC12918568

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.