Evidence mapPaperPMID 41593646Full record

ReviewJournal of ovarian research2026

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in ovarian cancer: transforming detection, treatment, and prevention.

Mahavir Singh, Sai N Betgeri, Sham S Kakar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of ovarian research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mahavir SinghDepartment of Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, 40202, USA. mahavir.singh@louisville.edu.
Sai N BetgeriDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, 40292, USA.
Sham S KakarDepartment of Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, 40202, USA. sham.kakar@louisville.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ovarian cancer remains a highly lethal malignancy, with advanced-stage diagnosis, recurrence, and chemoresistance, thus limiting clinical outcomes. Traditional biomarkers such as CA-125, BRCA1/2 status, and histopathology offer only a partial view of disease biology, often leading to suboptimal and empiric treatment choices. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) provide new opportunities to improve diagnosis, risk stratification, therapeutic selection, and prevention. By integrating multimodal data, including imaging, clinical records, and multi-omics profiles, AI/ML models can uncover complex patterns that enhance the prediction of treatment response, toxicity, recurrence, and survival. Radiomics and radiomics-based prognostic value (RPV/eRPV) models add further precision by extracting informative imaging phenotypes. Emerging architectures such as graph neural networks (GNNs) and transformer-based models extend these capabilities by modeling interactions among genetic alterations, pathways, and drug responses. Beyond disease management, AI-driven risk prediction and screening tools are gaining exciting relevance in preventive oncology. This review summarizes current and developing AI/ML applications across ovarian cancer care and highlights the translational challenges and opportunities for integrating explainable AI into the clinical workflows. Collectively, these recent innovations support a more personalized, data-integrated approach to reducing morbidity and improving patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMachine LearningOvarian NeoplasmsFemaleHumansArtificial intelligenceMachine learningMulti-modal data integrationOvarian cancerPrecision oncology

Identifiers

PMID41593646
PMCPMC12973937

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.