ReviewJournal of ovarian research2026
Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in ovarian cancer: transforming detection, treatment, and prevention.
Review in Journal of ovarian research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence in ovarian pathophysiology and management: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of ovarian research · 2026Pooled it
- Chemoresistance in gynecologic cancers: mechanistic insights and emerging platforms to overcome drug failure.Journal of ovarian research · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in ovarian cancer: advancing in precision diagnosis and clinical management.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ovarian cancer remains a highly lethal malignancy, with advanced-stage diagnosis, recurrence, and chemoresistance, thus limiting clinical outcomes. Traditional biomarkers such as CA-125, BRCA1/2 status, and histopathology offer only a partial view of disease biology, often leading to suboptimal and empiric treatment choices. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) provide new opportunities to improve diagnosis, risk stratification, therapeutic selection, and prevention. By integrating multimodal data, including imaging, clinical records, and multi-omics profiles, AI/ML models can uncover complex patterns that enhance the prediction of treatment response, toxicity, recurrence, and survival. Radiomics and radiomics-based prognostic value (RPV/eRPV) models add further precision by extracting informative imaging phenotypes. Emerging architectures such as graph neural networks (GNNs) and transformer-based models extend these capabilities by modeling interactions among genetic alterations, pathways, and drug responses. Beyond disease management, AI-driven risk prediction and screening tools are gaining exciting relevance in preventive oncology. This review summarizes current and developing AI/ML applications across ovarian cancer care and highlights the translational challenges and opportunities for integrating explainable AI into the clinical workflows. Collectively, these recent innovations support a more personalized, data-integrated approach to reducing morbidity and improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.