ReviewEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Decision, Inference, and Information: Formal Equivalences Under Active Inference.
Review in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A central challenge in artificial intelligence and cognitive science is identifying a unifying principle that governs inference, learning, and action. Active inference proposes such a principle: the minimization of variational free energy. Advocates of active inference argue that the framework subsumes classical models of optimal behavior-including Bayesian decision theory, resource rationality, optimal control, and reinforcement learning-while also instantiating information-theoretic principles such as rate-distortion theory and maximum entropy. However, the literature outlining these conceptual links remains fragmented, limiting integration across fields. This review develops these connections systematically. We show how these major frameworks admit formal correspondences with expected free energy minimization when expressed in variational form, exposing a shared optimization principle that underlies theories of optimal decision-making and information processing. This synthesis is intended both to orient researchers from other fields who are new to active inference and to clarify foundational assumptions for those already working within the framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.