ReviewAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
The Role of Genomics in Advancing and Standardising Bacteriophage Therapy.
Review in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Bacteriophages as post-harvest biocontrol agents againstFrontiers in nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- Genomic landscape of 340 virulent Acinetobacter bacteriophages reveals anti-CRISPR-enriched candidates for therapeutic prioritization.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026Article
- Encapsulation of Bacteriophages in Alginate Beads: Improved Viability Under Harsh Simulated Gastric and Intestinal Conditions for Phage Therapy Applications.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Characterization and Therapeutic Potential of a Novel Lytic Bacteriophage vB_Kp_H122 Targeting Multidrug-Resistant Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae of K57 Capsular Type.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bacteriophage therapy, which employs bacterial viruses to selectively eliminate pathogenic bacteria, has re-emerged as a promising strategy in the face of increasing antimicrobial resistance. However, its widespread clinical implementation is constrained by concerns regarding safety, standardisation, and predictable efficacy. In this review, we examine the key role of genomics in transforming phage therapy from an empirical practice into a standardised and personalised modality of contemporary medicine. We describe how whole-genome sequencing (WGS) provides a basis for safety assessment by enabling systematic screening to exclude virulence factors, antibiotic resistance genes, and markers of lysogeny. WGS also facilitates the prediction of therapeutic efficacy and supports more rational phage selection by identifying receptor-binding proteins and characterising bacterial defence systems. In clinical settings, WGS data are increasingly used to monitor the evolution of bacterial populations and to adapt phage cocktails during treatment, thereby supporting personalised, adaptive phage therapy. Looking ahead, further progress is likely to come from integrating synthetic biology and artificial intelligence to engineer phage-based therapeutics with programmable specificity and predictable properties. Together, these developments are shaping a new paradigm of phage therapy as a scientifically grounded, standardised and controlled strategy to treat infections caused by antibiotic-resistant bacteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.