ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Unmasking the Apex: Multimodality Imaging for the Evaluation of Left Ventricular Apical Obliteration.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Unmasking Eosinophilic Myocarditis: Importance of Multimodality Imaging and Histological Confirmation in a Challenging Case.Journal of cardiovascular echographyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Left ventricular (LV) apical obliteration represents a convergent imaging phenotype arising from diverse cardiac conditions, including thrombotic, hypertrophic, infiltrative, congenital, and neoplastic diseases. These conditions, despite sharing overlapping morphological features, require profoundly different management strategies. In this context, an accurate characterization of the LV apex is a cornerstone point, and can be performed through various techniques. Advances in multimodality imaging have substantially improved diagnostic precision, allowing clinicians to differentiate true obliteration from mimicking conditions such as hypertrabeculation, apical hypertrophy, or subendocardial fibrosis. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the anatomical variability of the LV apex and its implications for imaging interpretation. We appraise the role of echocardiography, including contrast-enhanced and speckle-tracking studies-alongside cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), computed tomography (CT), and selective nuclear imaging in the evaluation of apical pathology. For each principal cause of apical obliteration-LV thrombus, apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, left ventricular non-compaction, endomyocardial fibrosis, cardiac amyloidosis, and intracardiac tumors-we outline key diagnostic clues, imaging red flags, and distinguishing tissue characteristics. Special emphasis is given to the incremental value of CMR for tissue characterization, thrombus detection, and fibrosis mapping, as well as to the interpretative challenges posed by apical foreshortening, near-field artefacts, and suboptimal acoustic windows. A practical, stepwise imaging framework is proposed to guide clinicians through the differential diagnosis of apical obliteration using an integrated multimodality approach. Future directions include the incorporation of 4D flow, advanced mapping techniques, and artificial intelligence-powered analysis to refine apical phenotyping and identify early disease signatures. Recognizing the full spectrum of apical pathology and its imaging manifestations is essential to prevent misdiagnosis, enable timely therapeutic decisions, and improve risk stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.