ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Pediatric Cardio-Oncology: From Gap in Evidence to Future Perspectives.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Improved survival rates for paediatric cancer patients represent a major medical achievement, but they have simultaneously brought the long-term sequelae of oncological treatments into sharp focus. Cardiotoxicity stands out as one of the most serious complications, being the leading cause of non-relapse-related morbidity and mortality among childhood cancer survivors. This comprehensive review analyses the current landscape, highlighting the significant gap in evidence that hinders optimal care. This paper constitutes a comprehensive narrative and scoping review based on a critical analysis of current clinical guidelines, landmark studies, and consensus papers in paediatric cardio-oncology. Crucially, it assesses the heterogeneity and limitations of existing evidence regarding standardized surveillance protocols, primary prevention strategies, and acute/late-onset cardiovascular complication management. The review then identifies and critically discusses key areas for future research and clinical development. A critical gap in evidence persists in paediatric cardio-oncology, leading to significant variability in clinical practice and the underdiagnosis/undertreatment of cardiovascular risk factors in this vulnerable population. To bridge this gap, there is an urgent need for international collaborative research. The overarching goal is to transform paediatric cardio-oncology into a predictive and preventive speciality, ensuring that all childhood cancer survivors achieve not only extended life expectancy but also improved cardiovascular quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.