ReviewBiomolecules2026
Trends in Inhibitors, Structural Modifications, and Structure-Function Relationships of Phosphodiesterase 4: A Review.
Review in Biomolecules, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) is a key enzyme responsible for the hydrolysis of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP), thereby regulating essential signaling pathways involved in inflammation and immune modulation. Structural studies have demonstrated a high degree of conservation within the catalytic domains of PDE4 isoforms, accompanied by subtle conformational variations that underlie their selectivity and tissue-specific distribution. Elucidating these structural features has been instrumental in guiding the rational design of PDE4 inhibitors. Although synthetic PDE4 inhibitors such as roflumilast and apremilast exhibit significant therapeutic efficacy, their clinical application is often limited by dose-dependent adverse effects. These effects primarily arise from insufficient isoform selectivity, as current inhibitors tend to target multiple PDE4 subtypes indiscriminately, resulting in off-target pharmacological actions and reduced tolerability. In contrast, natural products-including flavonoids, terpenoids, and related polyphenolic compounds such as curcumin, α-mangostin, and their derivatives-have emerged as promising molecular scaffolds. Their lower toxicity, favorable biocompatibility, and structural diversity enable fine-tuning of potency and selectivity through rational modification. Integrating structural insights derived from crystallographic and computational studies with the optimization of natural compounds offers a sustainable and effective strategy for the development of safer, isoform-selective PDE4-targeted therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.