Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41594659›Full record

ReviewBiomolecules2026

Urolithiasis in Children-Clinical Picture, Pathogenesis, and Diagnostic Approach.

Justyna Pięta, Michał Szyszka, Patryk Lipiński, Piotr Skrzypczyk

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomolecules, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Justyna PiętaStudent Scientific Group, The Department of Pediatrics and Nephrology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0009-0007-2835-5064
Michał SzyszkaDepartment of Pediatrics and Nephrology, Doctoral School, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7336-7327
Patryk LipińskiDepartment of Pediatrics, Medical Center of Postgraduate Education, 01-813 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1849-8375
Piotr SkrzypczykDepartment of Pediatrics and Nephrology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1959-8255

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As in adults, urolithiasis is a significant health problem in children from an early age, having a very negative impact on health and quality of life and potentially leading to kidney function impairment. The occurrence of deposits in the urinary tract in a child is almost always the result of significant predisposing factors, including metabolic defects involving the kidney or the entire body (often inherited in a Mendelian fashion), urinary tract defects, or urinary tract infections. Among metabolic disturbances, idiopathic hypercalciuria, preceded by hypocitraturia, is the most common one. Any child with nephrolithiasis requires a careful metabolic evaluation, including blood tests, urinalysis, and, in many cases, molecular diagnosis. This narrative review presents the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and diagnostic process in children with nephrolithiasis. Special emphasis is put on pathophysiological pathways leading to metabolic kidney stone disease and metabolic diagnostic steps in children with urolithiasis, as metabolic disturbances are the most common cause of recurrent urolithiasis in Europe and North America. Nephrolithiasis should be treated as a symptom of renal or systemic disorders, and in every child, the cause of these disorders should be sought to prevent recurrence.

Indexed as

UrolithiasisChildHumanschildrendiagnosticmetabolic disorderstubulopathiesurinary tract infectionsurinary tract malformationsurolithiasis

Identifiers

PMID41594659
PMCPMC12838794

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.