Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41595097›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Sectoral Differences in Psychosocial Well-Being: The Role of Work Environment Factors Across Public Administration, Healthcare, Pharmaceutical, and Energy Services.

Evija Nagle, Iluta Skrūzkalne, Silva Seņkāne, Otto Andersen, Anna Nyberg, Olga Zamalijeva, Olga Rajevska, Ingūna Griškēviča, Andrejs Ivanovs, Ieva Reine

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Evija NagleStatistics Unit, Riga Stradiņš University, Dzirciema iela 16, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia.
Iluta SkrūzkalneStatistics Unit, Riga Stradiņš University, Dzirciema iela 16, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0009-0004-1763-4218
Silva SeņkāneStatistics Unit, Riga Stradiņš University, Dzirciema iela 16, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0002-1291-8412
Otto AndersenSchool of Business and Law, Agder University, Gimlemoen 25, 4630 Kristiansand, Norway.
Anna NybergDepartment of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Husargatan 3, SE-751 22 Uppsala, Sweden.
Olga ZamalijevaInstitute of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, Vilnius University, Universiteto g. 9, LT-01513 Vilnius, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0002-9186-8440
Olga RajevskaStatistics Unit, Riga Stradiņš University, Dzirciema iela 16, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0003-0295-8557
Ingūna GriškēvičaDepartment of Health Psychology and Pedagogy, Riga Stradiņš University, Dzirciema iela 16, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0003-2387-9284
Andrejs IvanovsStatistics Unit, Riga Stradiņš University, Dzirciema iela 16, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0002-7376-3776
Ieva ReineStatistics Unit, Riga Stradiņš University, Dzirciema iela 16, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0002-1643-0983

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The psychosocial well-being of employees is crucial to health and productivity, and it forms the basis for organisational sustainability. Unfortunately, most studies rely on narrow indicators or small samples and thus are not generalisable. The present study aims to identify psychosocial and health-related factors that distinguish employees with high and low SWB and determine whether these effects are universal or sector-specific. A total of 1628 employees with organisations in Latvia's public administration, healthcare, pharmaceutical and energy sectors participated by completing the Multidimensional Psychosocial Well-Being Scale for Employed Persons (MPSWEP). This instrument assesses five key work environment factors: social inclusion, professional development, work intensity, health risks and autonomy. Subjective well-being (SWB) was measured as a separate outcome variable, and additional self-reported health problems were included as an independent variable in the analysis. Higher odds of high SWB were observed with greater social inclusion (OR = 5.11;

Indexed as

autonomyhealth risksjob demands–resources modelLatviaprofessional developmentpsychosocial well-beingsectoral differencessocial inclusion

Identifiers

PMID41595097
PMCPMC12838197

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.