ReviewCancers2026
Autophagy Modulates Immunogenic Cell Death in Cancer.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Polyphyllin I Orchestrates Autophagy to Reprogram the Tumour Immune Microenvironment and Abrogate Cisplatin Resistance in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Clinical and experimental pharmacology & physiology · 2026Article
- The interplay between autophagy and immunogenic cell death: nanomaterial-based strategies for cancer immunotherapy.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Cyclodextrins as Modulators of Regulated Cell Death: Implications for Immunometabolism and Therapeutic Innovation.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immunogenic cell death (ICD) is a subtype of regulated cell death characterized by the spatiotemporally coordinated emission of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), such as calreticulin (CALR), ATP, and high-mobility group box-1 (HMGB1), which collectively prime tumor-specific T-cell responses. Autophagy, a lysosome-dependent catabolic process, is increasingly recognized as a key modifier of antitumor immunity and the tumor microenvironment (TME). In preclinical models, autophagy can not only promote ICD by sustaining endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, eukaryotic translation initiation factor-2α (eIF2α) phosphorylation, and secretory pathways, but it can also limit ICD by degrading DAMPs, antigenic cargo, and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules. The net outcome is highly context-dependent and determined by the tumor type, the nature and intensity of the stress, and the level at which autophagy is modulated. Herein, we summarize how autophagy affects the three canonical ICD-associated DAMPs, highlight solid-tumor models in which autophagy supports ICD, and contrast them with systems wherein autophagy inhibition is required for immunogenicity. We then focus on hematological malignancies, especially multiple myeloma, where recent reports implicate the autophagy-related protein GABARAP in bortezomib-induced ICD. Finally, we discuss the translational implications, including rational combinations of autophagy modulators with ICD-inducing chemotherapies, targeted drugs, and cellular immunotherapies, and outline the remaining challenges for safely harnessing the autophagy-ICD axis in the clinical setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.