ReviewCancers2026
Integrated and Comprehensive Diagnostics: An Emerging Paradigm in Precision Oncology.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immunohistochemistry (IHC) Versus Genomic Profiling in Cancer: Roles in Precision Medicine.Cureus · 2026Review
- Molecular Oncodiagnostics in Precision Oncology: Integrating Tumor Transcriptomics, Patient Pharmacogenetics, and Ex Vivo Chemoresistance Testing to Improve Individual Chemotherapy Response.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Genomic innovations in cancer prevention, diagnosis, prognosis and precision therapeutics.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent advances in molecular pathology, driven by integrated and comprehensive diagnostic approaches, have significantly advanced precision oncology. By leveraging multiomics technologies, molecular pathology enables the simultaneous assessment of genomic alterations, transcriptomic profiles, proteomic activity, and metabolic states integrated with conventional pathological evaluation to better explain tumour biology and behaviour. Large-scale international consortia, including The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Clinical Proteomic Tumour Analysis Consortium (CPTAC) have systematically demonstrated the value of harmonised multiomics analyses in defining tumour subtypes, uncovering functional dependencies, and generating clinically actionable insights. Evidence from coordinated precision oncology initiatives, such as the National Cancer Institute-Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (NCI-MATCH) trial further indicates that treatment strategies guided by molecular pathology profiling are associated with improved clinical outcomes, including progression-free survival in molecularly selected patient populations. Consequently, molecularly stratified treatment approaches are increasingly required in routine clinical practice to enable targeted therapies for selected tumour entities. Integration of molecular data with functional and clinical outcomes has further facilitated the detection of emerging mechanisms of therapeutic resistance and heterogeneous treatment responses. Importantly, studies have shown that reliance on genomic analysis alone is insufficient to achieve optimal targeted therapy, underscoring the need for multi-layered molecular interrogation. This review highlights the biological and clinical relevance of multiomics integration, emphasising its critical role in comprehensive morpho-molecular tumour assessment and functional analyses while providing clinicians with a practical framework for interpreting integrated molecular diagnostics and addressing the methodological and translational challenges that must be overcome to enable broader implementation of precision oncology in routine practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.