ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Digital Mental Health Through an Intersectional Lens: A Narrative Review.
Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For individuals with mental illness who experience multidimensional marginalization, the risks of encountering discrimination and receiving inadequate care are compounded. Artificial intelligence (AI) systems have propelled the provision of mental healthcare through the creation of digital mental health applications (DMHAs). DMHAs can be trained to identify specific markers of distress and resilience by incorporating community knowledge in machine learning algorithms. However, DMHAs that use rule-based systems and large language models (LLMs) may generate algorithmic bias. At-risk populations face challenges in accessing culturally and linguistically competent care, often exacerbating existing inequities. Creating equitable solutions in digital mental health requires AI training models that adequately represent the complex realities of marginalized people. This narrative review analyzes the current literature on digital mental health through an intersectional framework. Using an intersectional framework considers the nuanced experiences of individuals whose identities lie at the intersection of multiple stigmatized social groups. By assessing the disproportionate mental health challenges faced by these individuals, we highlight several culturally responsive strategies to improve community outcomes. Culturally responsive strategies include digital mental health technologies that incorporate the lived experience of individuals with intersecting identities while reducing the incidence of bias, harm, and exclusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.