Evidence mapPaperPMID 41595419Full record

ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Nutrition in Perinatal Midwifery Care: A Narrative Review of RCTs, Current Practices, and Future Directions.

Artemisia Kokkinari, Maria Dagla, Kleanthi Gourounti, Evangelia Antoniou, Nikoleta Tsinisizeli, Evangelos Tzamakos, Georgios Iatrakis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Artemisia KokkinariDepartment of Midwifery, School of Health & Care Sciences, University of West Attica, 12243 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0009-0002-1306-4815
Maria DaglaDepartment of Midwifery, School of Health & Care Sciences, University of West Attica, 12243 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-4871-999X
Kleanthi GourountiDepartment of Midwifery, School of Health & Care Sciences, University of West Attica, 12243 Athens, Greece.
Evangelia AntoniouDepartment of Midwifery, School of Health & Care Sciences, University of West Attica, 12243 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-4494-3089
Nikoleta TsinisizeliDepartment of Midwifery, School of Health & Care Sciences, University of West Attica, 12243 Athens, Greece.
Evangelos TzamakosDepartment of Midwifery, School of Health & Care Sciences, University of West Attica, 12243 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0009-0008-6317-5090
Georgios IatrakisDepartment of Midwifery, School of Health & Care Sciences, University of West Attica, 12243 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-8958-1248

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNutrition during the perinatal period, including pregnancy, childbirth, postpartum, and lactation, is a critical determinant of maternal and neonatal health. While the importance of balanced nutrition is well established, the integration of nutritional counseling into midwifery care remains inconsistent across settings. Evidence suggests that midwives are uniquely positioned to deliver nutrition-related support, yet gaps persist in their formal training and in the availability of structured guidance. These gaps are particularly evident in certain regions, such as Greece, where dedicated national guidelines for perinatal nutrition are lacking.

methodsThis systematized narrative review synthesises evidence from studies published between 2010 and 2025, retrieved through PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and relevant national guidelines. Although the synthesis draws on diverse study designs to provide contextual depth, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were prioritized and synthesized separately to evaluate the effectiveness of midwife-led interventions. In total, ten randomized controlled trials were included in the evidence synthesis, alongside additional observational and qualitative studies that informed the narrative analysis. Both international and Greek literature were examined to capture current practices, challenges, and knowledge gaps in the nutritional dimension of midwifery care.

resultsFindings indicate that adequate intake of macronutrients and micronutrients, including iron, folic acid, vitamin D, iodine, calcium, and omega-3 fatty acids, is essential for optimal maternal and neonatal outcomes. Despite this, studies consistently report insufficient nutritional knowledge among midwives, limited confidence in providing counseling, and variability in clinical practice. Socio-cultural factors, such as dietary traditions and migration-related challenges, further influence nutritional behaviors and access to guidance. Emerging approaches, including e-health tools, group counseling models, and continuity-of-care frameworks, show promise in enhancing midwives' capacity to integrate nutrition into perinatal care.

conclusionNutrition is a cornerstone of perinatal health, and midwives are strategically placed to address it. However, gaps in training, inconsistent guidelines, and cultural barriers limit the effectiveness of current practices. Strengthening midwifery education in nutrition, developing context-specific tools, and fostering interdisciplinary collaboration are essential steps toward more comprehensive and culturally sensitive perinatal care. Future research should focus on longitudinal and intervention studies that assess the impact of midwife-led nutritional counseling on maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Indexed as

breastfeeding nutritionlactationmaternal healthmidwifery careneonatal outcomesnutritional counselingperinatal healthperinatal nutritionpregnancy dietpublic health

Identifiers

PMID41595419
PMCPMC12840904

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.