ArticleGenes2026
cellMCD Effectively Discovers Drug Resistance and Sensitivity Genes for Acute Myeloid Leukemia.
Article in Genes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRapid advances in biotechnology provide researchers with the opportunity to integrate omics profiles (genomics, epigenomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, etc.) with multiple phenotypes or experimental conditions. In cancers such as acute myeloid leukemia (AML), where combination therapies are standard of care, identifying genetic drivers of drug resistance requires evaluating how genes are associated with multiple drug response phenotypes. Statistical analyses associating omics profiles with multiple phenotypes yield multiple significance values and rankings for each of many genes. There is a great need to consolidate these multiple rankings into a consensus ranking to prioritize specific genes for detailed follow-up wet-lab or clinical studies. METHODS/
resultsHere, we evaluate the well-known Fisher's method, the sum of squared z-statistics (SSz), and the recently published cellMCD method as tools for gene prioritization. In simulation studies, cellMCD showed very similar or highly superior performance to the widely used Fisher's and SSz methods. These advantages were also observed in an example application involving a CRISPR drug screen of an acute myeloid leukemia cell line.
conclusionsIn summary, our results indicate that cellMCD should be more widely used for prioritizing discoveries from multiple omic association studies. These methods are available as an R package on github.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.