ReviewGenes2026
Engineered Mesenchymal Stromal Cells in Oncology: Navigating Between Therapeutic Delivery and Tumor Promotion.
Review in Genes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rearming mesenchymal stem cells with engineering strategies to combat cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Biomimetic PD-1-MSCs membrane-engineered nanoparticles for enhanced blood-brain barrier penetration and anti- glioma therapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are intensively investigated in oncology owing to their intrinsic tumor-homing ability and capacity to deliver therapeutic agents directly into the tumor microenvironment (TME). Recent advances in genetic engineering have enabled precise modification of MSCs, allowing controlled expression of therapeutic genes and other cargo delivery, thus improving targeting efficiency. As cellular carriers, MSCs have been engineered to transport oncolytic viruses, suicide genes in gene-directed enzyme prodrug therapy (GDEPT), multifunctional nanoparticles, and therapeutic factors such as IFN-β or TRAIL, while engineered MSC-derived extracellular vesicles (MSC-EVs) offer a promising cell-free alternative. These strategies increase intratumoral drug concentration, amplify bystander effects, and synergize with standard therapies while reducing systemic toxicity. Conversely, accumulating evidence highlights the tumor-promoting properties of MSCs: once recruited by inflammatory and hypoxic cues, they remodel the tumor microenvironment by stimulating angiogenesis, suppressing immune responses, differentiating into cancer-associated fibroblasts, and promoting epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), ultimately enhancing invasion, metastasis, and therapy resistance. This duality has sparked both enthusiasm and concern in the oncology field. The present review outlines the paradoxical role of MSCs in oncology-ranging from their potential to promote tumor growth to their emerging utility as vehicles for targeted drug delivery. By highlighting both therapeutic opportunities and biological risks, we aim to provide a balanced perspective on how MSC-based strategies might be refined, optimized, and safely integrated into future cancer therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.