ReviewBiomedicines2026
Prenatal Diagnosis of Malformations of Cortical Development: A Review of Genetic and Imaging Advances.
Review in Biomedicines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Malformations of cortical development (MCD) are a group of neurodevelopmental disorders caused by abnormalities in cerebral cortex development, leading to conditions such as intellectual disability and refractory epilepsy. The prenatal phenotypes of MCD are complex and non-specific, complicating accurate diagnosis and prognosis assessment. Genetic testing, particularly chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and whole-exome sequencing (WES), has become an important tool for prenatal diagnosis. This review synthesizes current research on prenatal MCD, focusing on the integration of imaging and genetic diagnostic strategies based on the biological foundation of cortical development and the classification system of MCD. Prenatal MCD phenotypes show significant developmental stage clustering, with proliferation-phase abnormalities (62.9%) being the most common and microcephaly as the core phenotype. Genetic studies have revealed a high degree of genetic heterogeneity in MCD, with etiologies encompassing chromosomal abnormalities and a wide range of single-gene mutations. These mutations are clustered by phenotype: microcephaly is associated with neuronal proliferation/DNA repair genes; macrocephaly is driven by genes in the PI3K-AKT-mTOR and RAS-MAPK signaling pathways; and gyral and sulcal abnormalities are closely linked to microtubule-associated genes and migration pathways. De novo mutations account for the majority of pathogenic genetic alterations identified in MCD (50.6%); up to 75.1% of pathogenic mutations cannot be detected by routine prenatal screening. Based on this, the review emphasizes that for fetuses with suspected MCD, NGS, with WES at its core, plays an increasingly important role in achieving early and accurate prenatal diagnosis. Future research should prioritize the advancement of integrated diagnostic methods and large-scale cohort studies to further elucidate genotype-phenotype associations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.