Evidence mapPaperPMID 41595680Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2026

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Pediatric Endocrine Tumors: Opportunities, Pitfalls, and a Roadmap for Trustworthy Clinical Translation.

Michaela Kuhlen, Fabio Hellmann, Elisabeth Pfaehler, Elisabeth André, Antje Redlich

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michaela KuhlenDepartment of Pediatrics, Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Otto-von-Guericke-University, Leipziger Str. 44, D-39120 Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4577-0503
Fabio HellmannHuman-Centered Artificial Intelligence, University of Augsburg, Universitaetsstrasse 6a, D-86159 Augsburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6404-0827
Elisabeth PfaehlerInstitute for Neuroscience and Medicine 4 (INM-4), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Wilhlem-Johnen-Straße, D-52428 Jülich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6160-3011
Elisabeth AndréHuman-Centered Artificial Intelligence, University of Augsburg, Universitaetsstrasse 6a, D-86159 Augsburg, Germany.
Antje RedlichDepartment of Pediatrics, Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Otto-von-Guericke-University, Leipziger Str. 44, D-39120 Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1732-1869

Funding

Deutsche Kinderkrebsstiftung DKS 2021.11, 2024.16, 2025.07, and 2025.37
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are reshaping cancer research and care. In pediatric oncology, early evidence-most robust in imaging-suggests value for diagnosis, risk stratification, and assessment of treatment response. Pediatric endocrine tumors are rare and heterogeneous, including intra- and extra-adrenal paraganglioma (PGL), adrenocortical tumors (ACT), differentiated and medullary thyroid carcinoma (DTC/MTC), and gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NEN). Here, we provide a pediatric-first, entity-structured synthesis of AI/ML applications in endocrine tumors, paired with a methods-for-clinicians primer and a pediatric endocrine tumor guardrails checklist mapped to contemporary reporting/evaluation standards. We also outline a realistic EU-anchored roadmap for translation that leverages existing infrastructures (EXPeRT, ERN PaedCan). We find promising-yet preliminary-signals for early non-remission/recurrence modeling in pediatric DTC and interpretable survival prediction in pediatric ACT. For PGL and GEP-NEN, evidence remains adult-led (biochemical ML screening scores; CT/PET radiomics for metastatic risk or peptide receptor radionuclide therapy response) and serves primarily as methodological scaffolding for pediatrics. Cross-cutting insights include the centrality of calibration and validation hierarchy and the current limits of explainability (radiomics texture semantics; saliency ≠ mechanism). Translation is constrained by small datasets, domain shift across age groups and sites, limited external validation, and evolving regulatory expectations. We close with pragmatic, clinically anchored steps-benchmarks, multi-site pediatric validation, genotype-aware evaluation, and equity monitoring-to accelerate safe, equitable adoption in pediatric endocrine oncology.

Indexed as

endocrine tumorsethical AIexplainabilitymachine learningpediatric oncologyradiomicsrisk stratificationtechquity

Identifiers

PMID41595680
PMCPMC12838638

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.