ReviewBiomedicines2026
Emerging Nonpharmacologic Analgesic Technologies in Anesthesia: Mechanisms, Evidence, and Future Directions for Pharmacologic Alternatives.
Review in Biomedicines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Perioperative pain remains a major clinical challenge, with many surgical patients experiencing inadequate analgesia and progression to chronic postsurgical pain. Conventional opioid-centered strategies are limited by narrow therapeutic windows, systemic toxicity, tolerance, opioid-induced hyperalgesia, and poor efficacy in neuroimmune-driven pain states. Advances in molecular neuroscience and biomedical engineering have catalyzed the development of nonpharmacologic analgesic technologies that modulate pain pathways through biophysical rather than receptor-ligand mechanisms. This narrative review synthesizes emerging nonpharmacologic analgesic platforms relevant to anesthesiology, integrating molecular, cellular, and systems-level mechanisms with clinical evidence. It examines how peripheral sensitization, spinal dorsal horn plasticity, glial and neuroimmune activation, and supraspinal network dysfunction create ideal targets for device-based interventions. Electrical neuromodulation strategies, including peripheral and central techniques, are discussed alongside temperature-based, photonic, and focused-energy modalities. These include cryoneurolysis, radiofrequency techniques, photobiomodulation, and low-intensity focused ultrasound. Clinical integration within enhanced recovery pathways, patient selection, workflow considerations, and limitations of the current human evidence base are reviewed. While many of these technologies are established in chronic pain management, this review emphasizes available human perioperative data and discusses how chronic pain evidence informs perioperative translation within opioid-sparing multimodal anesthesia care. Collectively, these technologies support a mechanism-based, systems-level approach to pain modulation, with perioperative relevance varying by modality and strength of available human evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.