ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Age Estimation of the Cervical Vertebrae Region Using Deep Learning.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Time-Frequency Respiratory Impedance Maps Enable Within-Breath Deep Learning for Small Airway Dysfunction Identification.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Since skeletal development is largely completed by adulthood, it is difficult for traditional methods to capture subtle age-related structural changes in bones and surrounding tissues. Recent advances in deep learning have demonstrated remarkable potential in medical image-based age estimation. The cervical vertebrae, as captured in lateral cephalometric radiographs (LCR), have shown particular value in such tasks. To systematically investigate the contribution of different vertebral representations to age estimation, we developed four distinct input modes: (1) Contour (C); (2) Mask (M); (3) Cervical Vertebrae (CV) and (4) Cervical vertebrae region (SR). Using a large-scale LCR dataset of 20,174 subjects aged 4-40 years, grouped into 5-year intervals, we evaluated these modes with deep learning models. The Mean Absolute Error (MAE) was used to evaluate performance. Results indicated that the SR mode achieved the lowest overall MAE, particularly for the C1-C4 combination, followed by CV, while C and M modes showed similar and poorer performance. For subjects younger than 25 years, MAEs for individual vertebrae (C1-2, C3, C4) were less than 5 years across all modes; however, in the 26-40 years group, MAEs for C and M modes exceeded 10 years, whereas CV and SR modes remained below 10 years for most combinations. Combining vertebrae consistently improved accuracy over individual ones, with continuous combinations (e.g., C1-2 + C3) outperforming discontinuous ones (e.g., C1-2 + C4). Visualization of age-related salience revealed that salient regions varied by input mode and expanded with increased information content. These findings underscore the critical importance of incorporating peripheral soft tissue and comprehensive vertebral context for accurate age estimation across a wide age spectrum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.