ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Post-Mortem Biomarkers in Sudden Cardiac Death: From Classical Biochemistry to Molecular Autopsy and Multi-Omics Forensic Approaches.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Proteomics in Cardiovascular Deaths, a Postmortem Pilot Study: The Diagnostic Efficacy of α-1 Antitrypsin and Apolipoprotein A-IV in Ischemic and Congestive Deaths.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sudden cardiac death (SCD) remains a major challenge in forensic medicine, representing a leading cause of natural mortality and frequently occurring in individuals without antecedent symptoms. Although conventional autopsy and histology remain the cornerstones of investigation, up to 10-15% of cases are classified as "autopsy-negative sudden unexplained death," underscoring the need for complementary diagnostic tools. In recent years, post-mortem biochemistry and molecular approaches have become essential to narrowing this gap. Classical protein markers of myocardial necrosis (cardiac troponins, CK-MB, H-FABP, GPBB) continue to play a fundamental role, though their interpretation is influenced by post-mortem interval and sampling site. Peptide biomarkers reflecting hemodynamic stress (BNP, NT-proBNP, copeptin, sST2) offer additional insight into cardiac dysfunction and ischemic burden, while inflammatory and immunohistochemical markers (CRP, IL-6, fibronectin, desmin, C5b-9, S100A1) assist in detecting early ischemia and myocarditis when routine histology is inconclusive. Beyond these traditional markers, molecular signatures-including cardiac-specific microRNAs, exosomal RNA, proteomic alterations, and metabolomic fingerprints-provide innovative perspectives on metabolic collapse and arrhythmic mechanisms. Molecular autopsy through next-generation sequencing has further expanded diagnostic capability by identifying pathogenic variants associated with channelopathies and cardiomyopathies, enabling both cause-of-death clarification and cascade screening in families. Emerging multi-omics and artificial intelligence frameworks promise to integrate these heterogeneous data into standardized and robust interpretive models. Pre- and post-analytical considerations, together with medico-legal implications ranging from malpractice evaluation to the management of genetic information, remain essential components of this evolving field. Overall, the incorporation of validated biomarkers into harmonized international protocols, increasingly supported by AI, represents the next frontier in forensic cardiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.