ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Pulmonary Embolism in Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS)-Where Are We and Where Are We Going?
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulmonary embolism (PE) is one of the most serious complications of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), a systemic autoimmune disorder defined by thrombotic events and persistent antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLA). PE occurs in 11-20% of patients and may constitute the initial clinical manifestation. Young and middle-aged women are most frequently affected, and triple-positive aPLA profiles markedly increase the risk of recurrence and long-term morbidity, including chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). This review article summarizes current evidence on the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnostic approach, and management of PE in APS. Key mechanisms include anti-β2-glycoprotein I-mediated endothelial and platelet activation, complement engagement, and neutrophil extracellular trap formation, resulting in immunothrombosis. Diagnostic pathways follow standard PE algorithms; however, chronically elevated D-dimer levels and lupus anticoagulant-related aPTT prolongation require careful interpretation and consideration. Long-term vitamin K antagonist therapy remains the standard of care, whereas direct oral anticoagulants are not recommended in high-risk APS. Future directions include improved risk stratification through detailed aPLA profiling and the use of emerging biomarkers, early screening for CTEPH, and the development of targeted therapies such as complement inhibition and anti-NETosis strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.